Rat-face still trying for a “whitewash”

Posted on by
Reply

Federal Labor MP Craig Thomson will not be subject to a criminal investigation by New South Wales Police.   Naturally!  Corrupt police always protect corrupt politicans.   Has been so since the dawn of time.

Mr Thomson, whose seat plays a critical role in the Gillard government’s balance of power, is under pressure over how his Health Services Union credit card was used to pay for prostitutes while he was heading up the union.  How come?   Hasn’t the Union always prostituted itself?

The Member for Dobell has admitted authorising the payment to an escort service in 2005 – but has said another man used the card and forged his signature.   Well now, we may  have guessed it was someone else’s fault – isn’t it always?

In a statement issued overnight, police said there was no basis for a formal investigation into any offence under New South Wales law.   Even if there had been [and many think that is the case] I am sure the orders from the rat-face via the Commissioner would have ensured the same outcome.

Police media spokeswoman Joanne Elliot says the State Crime Fraud and Cyber Crime Squad made its assessment after receiving a letter from shadow attorney-general George Brandis about the credit card’s use.  State Crime Fraud and Cyber Crime Squad?   Does this mean the crooks in the police have their own squad?

“Based on the subsequent material and information provided to NSW Police by the Health Services Union, including a 120-page document relating to their own examination of the use of Mr Thomson’s credit card, it was concluded that based on the accounting practices of the union relating to the use of corporate credit cards there was no evidence to warrant a formal investigation by NSW police,” she said.   Surprise, surprise.

However, NSW Police are sending the material to Victorian Police because the financial controls of the Health Services Union are conducted out of the Melbourne office.

Police in Victoria have told the ABC they are waiting for the referral from NSW, and will assess it before deciding what action should be taken.   If any, of course.  No bets on what  that outcome will be.

Senator Brandis has told AM he does not owe Mr Thomson an apology.   Why should anyone owe a criminal an apology?

“Not at all,” he said.  Right on!

“The police in New South Wales have decided that, regardless of what you think of that, they don’t consider it reaches the threshold of a prosecution. But the facts remain.”  The facts should not be allowed to get in the way of political expediency.

But Deputy Prime Minister Wayne Swan told Radio National Breakfast that the comments by NSW Police are clear.    Especially if they came directly from the Rat-face via her mouthpiece the Commissioner.

“I notice that Mr Brandis is still out there throwing mud again this morning, but this is quite a categorical statement.”    I wonder what is meant by this mumbo-jumbo.  I would ask Swan but I doubt if he would know either.

Thomson issued a statement saying: “I have always rejected claims of wrongdoing in these matters … I will make a comprehensive statement in the near future.”  Ah, yes, I was waiting for this ubiquitous political claim that “I have done nothing wrong”   One would think that even lame-brained [should that be no-brained] politicians would have a better phrase to cover their criminal activities.

Senator Brandis when asked if he owed an apology to Mr Thomson, Senator Brandis said: “Not at all. What I and others have brought to light shows a course of conduct by him, over years, in which he used members’ money as if it were his own.”  I thought that was one of the perks of being a Union hack in a top job.   One cannot fault Thomson for that since all Union officials are tarred with the same brush.

But Mr Thomson and union boss Michael Williamson, then senior figures at the union, were allegedly provided with credit cards by a graphic design business that was paid exorbitant amounts to produce a union newsletter.    More commonly known as “backhanders” and of course, nothing new.

Union accounts reveal the business, run by John and Carron Gilleland, received about $670,000 a year to produce 10 issues of the newsletter Health Standard – up to 10 times what other unions pay.    Nice pickings if one can get them.   No corruption there of course.

Mr Williamson has denied allegations he “ran amok” with the credit card, which were directed at him by Mrs Gilleland at an HSU function this year. Mr Thomson has not made any comment.  The “merde” in which he is submerged is deep enough without his qualifying it further.

Senator Brandis today wrote to NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione requesting that he “make an assessment and, if appropriate, direct your officers to make an investigation”. Ha, more time wasted sending letters to a hack controlled by a rat-face.

The Liberal frontbencher said there appeared to be a prima facie case of a “corrupt commission” being paid under section 249B of the Crimes Act.   Won’t happen.

“It may well be that the NSW Police conclude that on the basis of the material that is published … there is not enough to go on with to a prosecution,” Senator Brandis said.   He got that right.   A snowball in hell has a better chance.

“But there certainly seems to be evidence of a course of dealing between Mr Thomson and this supplier to the union … of which he was at the time national secretary, and the conferral on Mr Thomson of a benefit.”

Senator Brandis said he had not contacted the NSW Police Minister about the matter, as he had done with the previous referral and attracted Labor criticism for breaching the separation of powers.  Since the Police Minister in NSW  is no doubt party to the wishes of the rat-face in charge of the country where is the separation of powers?

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott said both Mr Thomson and Prime Minister Julia Gillard owed the Parliament an explanation.    Yes, and is that not a squadron of porkers flying overhead?  Let’s face it.  If either of these degenerates makes a statement it will be patently false.

The rat-face leader needs this crooked Union hack more than ever to retain her elevated post – too much to hope he gets his just deserts followed by her preferred rapid departure.

Expect another “Not guilty” verdict!

Posted on by
Reply

Liberal Senator Mary Jo Fisher has broken down in tears as she testified at her shoplifting trial, telling the Adelaide Magistrates Court she was suffering from chronic depression. Crying no doubt because she was caught.

The Senator is alleged to have taken $92 of goods from a supermarket at suburban Frewville in Adelaide last December before assaulting security guard Cathryn Groot by pushing her and shutting her arm in a car door.  So, she was merely being a  politician who can enter the usual claim…..”I have done nothing wrong”

Fisher said she was diagnosed in 2009 with chronic depression and she experienced symptoms again during a news conference last year.   Time to resign from parliament one would think.

Fisher’s treating psychiatrist also is expected to be called to give evidence.   Oh, a psychiatrist?   Aren’t they those who swear the only reason the psychotic killer did it was because he had a bad upbringing?

Magistrate Kym Boxall ruled earlier alleged confessions Fisher made to police were admissible.   Naturally, a magistrate who would accept any evidence against a politician?   No way!   I am surprised that the whole thing wasn’t thrown out by this moron.  Besides what were the police thinking?   Surely they got their orders from on high to drop this case?   If not where was the Police Commissioner?   Asleep in bed or drunk in a gutter somewhere?

Her lawyer, Michael Abbott QC, had tried to have the interview with police ruled inadmissible because he said Fisher was induced or threatened by the security officer and did not make the admissions voluntarily.   Obviously this security officer should be charged with torture and keeping a person captive against her will.    I was beginning to hope hot irons were in play but doubt the veracity of the statement made by Mr Liar the Lawyer.

The magistrate ruled the security officer had induced the Senator by saying it would be better for Fisher if she cooperated, but ruled that conversation would not have affected Fisher when she spoke to police and was cautioned.     Oh, poor woman, induced indeed?   If she admitted that she was a thief [politician - same thing isn't it?] then that should be accepted.   Of course no magistrate is going to accept evidence against a politician…………I am surprised the security officer wasn’t charged with damaging the car in which her arm was forced.

“I was concerned that the awful truth was dawning that I may have come out of the store with some goods that I hadn’t paid for”.    Bad English grammar as well as a bad lie.   She obviously knew what she was doing.

“From the moment I got into the store I was unable to focus on the task that I had set myself.  Hmm, this definitely sounds like a politician.   The physical symptoms started to kick in and abruptly so,” she said.

“I felt as if I wasn’t in control and it culminated in a fear of doing something that wasn’t necessarily in my control.”    So, she admits she was out of control as soon as she got into the store…………..time to go home then I believe.

OK, so we haven’t heard [yet] the usual pollie claim that “I have done nothing wrong” but I would bet a pound to the proverbial that this woman is going to get off with a warning so that one more thief can get herself back into parliament without a stain on an otherwise perfect? character.

Given that politicians in general are a bunch of uncaring, dishonest, lying morons perhaps she will be welcomed back by the rest of the degenerates populating the House.

One thing is for sure, when she is convicted I will partake of my head-wear as a meal!   The only thing in her favour is the fact of being a politician who will, as ever, get away with it.

Exit rat-face from the Land of the Long White Cloud

Posted on by
Reply

I hear that the Australian rat-face is cutting short her trip to New Zealand for the Pacific Islands Forum to return home tonight.

More likely New Zealand has enforced its’ stringent quarantine laws and prevented this over-sized rodent from contaminating the country.   I would imagine that also includes the other immoral rat with which she is “shacked-up”

Originally scheduled to fly back tomorrow after watching the Wallabies rugby union team train for the World Cup, Ms Gillard will now meet the team this evening.    How nauseating for them.   I know that Rugby players have to be  tough but even that could be a problem for the strongest stomachs.

She’ll then return to the task of trying to finalise Labor’s new asylum seeker policy ["new"? - I didn't even realize Labor had an old policy, of any sort] after the High Court last week scuttled her Malaysia people swap deal.   I can never understand  Labor’s problem with these illegals [I always call them what they are].   Why don’t they follow the example of past Labor governments, particularly the UK and let anyone in.    Gives every one of them the chance to participate in mayhem and looting.    What I cannot understand is the logic of refusing entry to anyone who can afford to fly to Australia without passport, visa etc., yet welcoming those who can afford to pay to arrive in a boat.    Not only rolling out the red carpet but actually placing a naval vessel at their disposal.   They are then carried at even greater expense to shore, put up in fairly good accommodation [tell that to those Australians living on the street] which they are then allowed to incinerate.   Far from then being punished, they are accommodated elsewhere at even greater expense to the taxpayer.   Idiocy encouraged by those bewigged morons who sit on the benches of our Courts.   Couple that with the money being poured into that bottomless pit called the South Pacific Islands.    Naturally politicians look much more gracious giving our money away to foreigners than to those who live here.

Of course, one can understand her haste to return to Australia.   After all, if she were away too long, people would realize that the country was running a lot better without her.

Surely this misbegotten misfit should emulate the example of Mike Rann and Kevin Foley who have made their greatest contribution to the country – by resigning.    I guess if we expect that we should all change our name to Buckley.

 

        Is that you Mum?   

 

Just another Labor rip-off

Posted on by
Reply

The rat-face in charge together with her other sexual perverted members of parliament has decided to introduce a so-called “Carbon Tax”.

Of course everyone else realizes that it has nothing whatsoever to do with carbon but everything to do with just another tax to cover the Labor government’s incompetence in dealing with finance matters.

Not only that but rat-face and her Minister for Climate Change [a big name for a small brain] has been misleading everybody as to the price of this elusive carbon especially where China is concerned.

The Minister has claimed that China’s price on carbon is over $8 per tonne compared with Australia’s $2.34.   The truth is that the Minister’s own department advised that China’s price was really only $1.78 a lot less than Australia’s.

So the Minister with the collusion of his boss was acting in the accepted manner of a politician – he was lying.   How unusual.

Of course one must wonder why, since his department knew of the false information, they did nothing to correct it.

So now we have not only the lie about  the “No Carbon Tax” promise which was  made, we have the Treasury modelling based on misleading assumptions and now all of that is compounded by government-funded reports which continue the falsehoods.

The government is well aware that the carbon tax and direct action renewable energy fund will increase electricity prices, impose a higher tax than any other country and damage the Australian economy.

Of course the Minister could explain why he was lying but then he would also have to explain who told him to lie and sure as eggs he isn’t going to drop old rat-face in the poo.

Notwithstanding all the aforementioned it would be amusing if it were not so serious but these knuckle-headed morons must know that Australia trying to stop carbon is like the old King who tried to turn back the waves.   It won’t happen.

All the time that other countries, the US in particular, make no effort to cut back on carbon emissions the little that Australia does is a drip in the ocean.

Why cannot the Labor idiots admit that having made a total muck-up of the economy [and everything else including illegal migrants] they have to introduce a new TAX to cover their malfeasances.

And we are stuck with the fools ’til what? 2014.

It isn’t God bless America these days………it’s God help Australia.

Political correctness – corrected!

Posted on by
1

Government bows to religious right

ATTORNEY-GENERAL Rob Hulls will today announce a controversial compromise struck with the state’s religious groups that will allow them to continue to discriminate against gays and lesbians, single mothers and people who hold different spiritual beliefs.

In a move that has delighted religious groups but angered gay activists and discrimination experts, Mr Hulls will protect the right of hundreds of church-run organisations – including schools, hospitals and welfare services – to refuse to employ or provide services to people who they believe may undermine their beliefs.   Not before time.   Why should everyone have to condone sexual perverts and be forced to accept unwanted groups?! How long before muggers, rapists and terrorists are presented as “acceptable” and we are forced to bend to the will of those who would have us believe that these things are “natural”?

Under the deal, Mr Hulls will allow church groups to continue discriminating on the grounds of sex, sexuality, marital and parental status and gender identity. But they will be unable to discriminate on the basis of race, disability, age, physical features, political beliefs or activity, or breastfeeding.  I can agree wholeheartedly with this although sometimes “race” can be a bit dubious.

The decision has dismayed groups that argued that the review was a chance to eliminate entrenched discrimination in Victoria, which has more exemptions to its equal opportunity law than any other state.    Now, what “groups” would that be?    Only the queers and deviants, I’ll bet!  Why should one not be able to discriminate against the unnatural?   I for one will never accept sexual perverts under any circumstances.   To me they are an abhorrence and should be disposed of in the manner that Ezekiel suggested.

Leading discrimination law expert Professor Margaret Thornton said it was a win for fundamentalist religious groups. ”In terms of a person’s private life  their sexual preference or marital status really has nothing to do with their ability to perform a job.   This in itself is bullshit coming from a so-called “academic”.    I would never allow my child to be educated by a sexual deviant even if schools are becoming breeding  grounds for these people in the teaching profession! Being able to discriminate on marital status is particularly absurd. It is really out of date. It really amounts to the policing of women because the focus is on single mothers, not on men.”

Trouble is too many married women are taking the jobs traditionally occupied by school-leavers…..another reason for high youth unemployment!

Religious groups have mounted a campaign to save their exemptions, which mean, for example, that conservative religious schools can refuse to hire single mothers or gays – even as cleaners – and that an Islamic organisation can decline to employ a Christian.   Why should “gays” [as the politically correct idiots refer to sexual perverts] be employed by anyone who doesn’t want to be associated with deviants at all?  Also why should a Christian or non-religious order have to employ Islamic weirdos?

Mr Hulls told The Sunday Age that the changes, which pre-empt a parliamentary committee report due within weeks, will limit how church groups discriminate. If a religious welfare agency refused to offer services to a same-sex couple [another euphemism for deviants], for instance, the agency would have to demonstrate how this action conformed with its religious doctrine. If a religious school rejected an atheist for a receptionist’s position, the school must show why a person needed to adhere to certain religious beliefs.

But it will still fall to the victim of discrimination to make a complaint and force the religious body to justify its actions. The changes will be part of legislation introduced early next year.

The compromise means that in the lead-up to next year’s election, Labor can make peace with conservative and religious groups, already at odds with the Government over the decriminalisation of abortion.  A well-needed legislation to ensure the survival of Labor politicians – most of whom, if not all, are the epitome of abortions! Mr Hulls said the Government never intended to restrict religious freedom in Victoria. He said the changes struck the right balance between religious freedoms and Victorians’ ability to be free of discrimination: ”We have decided to narrow the broad exemptions that currently exist but also ensure that bodies maintain their right to religious freedom.”

Mr Hulls’ announcement was immediately endorsed at the highest levels of the Victorian Catholic Church, with Archbishop Denis Hart hailing the decision as ”striking a fair and correct balance” between competing rights. The Australian Christian Lobby’s Victorian director, Rob Ward, also welcomed the decision.

The Victorian Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby’s convener, Hayley Conway, said it was concerning that religious groups holding Government contracts for welfare work were still exempted from the discrimination laws. ”We would have preferred to see Rob Hulls take a much stronger step on these issues,” she said.     Gays and Lesbians, those misfits of sexual perversions should be grateful that they are allowed at all in this world!

Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission chief executive officer Helen Szoke said the move was a good step, but ”a whole section of the community is still left out”. She hoped that eventually the community would understand there was no reason to treat people differently because of their sexual preferences or marital status.   Oh, trust that bunch of do-gooder no-hopers to get in on the act!   That bunch of bleeding hearts must seemingly be comprised of persons of the same ilk as the queers parading as people.    The so-called Human Rights Commission have caused almost as many problems in this world as are attributed to Al Qaeda!